LITIGATION HOLDINGS PROUDLY FILES ITS FIRST PLAYABLE PROCEEDING ◆ CLIENT VICTORIES TO DATE: 0 ◆ ALL FLAVOR TEXT IS TESTIMONY ◆ EXHIBIT VALUATIONS PREVIOUSLY CIRCULATED IN FOUR DIGITS WERE DISPLAYED VALUES — THE COURT ADMITS ACTUAL VALUES ONLY ◆ THE VERDICT IS NOT THE POINT ◆ OBJECTION NOTED. OVERRULED. ◆ BILLING CONTINUES DURING RECESS ◆
Indifferencer LLC· Litigation Holdings Division

The Corporate Courtroom
A Playable Proceeding

"Objection. This meeting could have been an email."
Animal Farm wearing Savile Row · Where the winner is never the client

Local Rules of Procedure — Abridged for New Counsel

  1. You are counsel. So is the machine. The client pays for both of you. The client is not in the room.
  2. The proceeding runs five stages. Each stage, both sides call one card. Higher testimony holds the narrative for that stage. Hold more narrative through Closing Arguments and the verdict is yours. (Stages IV and V count double. Late testimony is the only kind anyone remembers.)
  3. Every witness you call bills its BUD to the client's retainer — win or lose the stage. If the retainer hits zero, the case is dismissed, and the proceeding is awarded to whichever firm billed more. Read that sentence again.
  4. A witness's TIME is its remaining engagement. Testifying at Stage N consumes N TIME. Witnesses with TIME left return to your hand. The rest are excused, with thanks, forever.
  5. Documents (dashed cards) bill nothing and testify at a flat 5 — but each one entered erodes the definable subject of the proceeding. Subject reaches zero: mistrial. Again — most billables wins a mistrial.
  6. You carry two objections. An objection strikes half of a witness's testimony and enters one skeptical question into the record. Some witnesses perform better under scrutiny. It says so on their card. Read the cards.
A tied stage means both parties entered the same version of events. Neither controls. The definable subject erodes by 1.
If the proceeding concludes with the narrative tied: no verdict. The client still does not know the answer to their original question.
The client cannot win. That is not a rule. It is a finding.
In the matter before the court

Client's original question: unanswered · Client outcome: pending